You are here

Crystal River Archaeological State Park

-A A +A
300 BCE–600 CE. 3400 N. Museum Point

Crystal River is one of the most prominent Pre-Columbian mound sites in Florida and dates to approximately 300 BCE to 600 CE (though these figures are debated). Located on its eponymous river, the complex is situated between the stream’s source and the Gulf of Mexico. Archaeologists believe that the site of prehistoric Crystal River, now an inland location that features shell middens, was at one point closer to the Gulf, but changing sea levels have since distanced it. The site consists of six mounds, two for burial activity and four with platforms, as well as a distinct curved shell midden; Ripley P. Bullen in American Antiquity 17 (October 1951) described this formation as a “fishhook with a temple mound where the barb of the hook would be.” The largest feature, Mound A, is over 28 feet tall, 182 feet long, and 100 feet wide. Some mounds were crafted of midden material and others of sand.

Crystal River is nothing short of a monumental construction, one created over several iterations by coastal hunter-gatherer-fisher groups. Like the Mount Royal site in Crescent City, Florida, Crystal River was a center of religious and ceremonial activity and, according to Jerald T. Milanich (Famous Florida Sites: Crystal River and Mount Royal, 1999) was likely dominated by a prosperous lineage group that gained wealth through trade networks. Mounds were massive, physical signifiers of that kinship.

Excavations first began with C. B. Moore in 1903; this and his two successive visits, which included mapping the site, remain the baseline for study at Crystal River. Moore and his researchers uncovered the burial remains of 429 persons at this time, though his protocol lacked the contemporary grid system that allows archaeologists to understand the patterning and placement of artifacts. Moore worked specifically on Mounds E and F, recovering pottery, pipes, shell jewelry, tools, copper objects, and much more. Pottery discovered at Crystal River included “negatively painted” items—featuring a buff brown surface and black pigmented designs—a technique suggestive of the Mississippian period (800–1600).

Moore’s work, while revelatory, launched Crystal River’s ambiguous status as an “enigmatic” site, to use Ripley P. Bullen’s phrase, by which he means the curious and contested chronology of the complex. Ever since, scholars have hotly debated the proper dating, influences, and chronology of the site. Both the built environment and artifacts at Crystal River are simultaneously suggestive of Hopewellian and Mississippian cultures, including the flat-topped mounds, which define the latter. This confusion was compounded by a lack of modern excavations, in addition to the curious discovery in the 1960s of limestone stelae at Crystal River, one of which stands 66 inches off the ground, and the other a mere 41 inches tall. These stelae merely added to the debate surrounding the site’s lineage, leading some scholars to suggest Mesoamerican influences and astronomical events. Jerald T. Milanich, perhaps the leading figure on Floridian archaeology, describes the complex as a Deptford Period complex which formed into a major trading center with Ohio Hopewellian communities (200 BCE to 500 CE).

The recent work of Thomas J. Pluckhahn, Victor D. Thompson, and Brent R. Weisman (Southeastern Archaeology 29, Summer 2010) has however helped to shed light on this question further, providing critical first steps toward “revising” the history of Crystal River. Using modern processes such as soil coring and topographic mapping, they argue that Crystal River perhaps dates back to 300 BCE, with usage lasting until 600 CE.

The contested history of Crystal River’s origins and evolution makes the site intriguing; future scholarship on the history of the complex will be critical in understanding the crucial role and positioning of the site in Pre-Columbian society. Visitors can experience the mounds at the Crystal River Archaeological State Park, which is open year-round and features an interpretative museum.

References

Barnes, Mark R. “Crystal River Site.” National Register of Historic Places Registration Form, 1989. National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC.

Bullen, Ripley P. “The Enigmatic Crystal River Site.” American Antiquity17, no. 2 (October 1951): 142–43.

Milanich, Jerald T. Famous Florida Sites: Crystal River and Mount Royal. Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 1999.

Pluckhahn, Thomas J., Victor D. Thompson, and Alexander Cherinsky. "The Temporality of Shell-bearing Landscapes at Crystal River, Florida." Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 37 (March 2015): 19–36.

Pluckhahn, Thomas J., Victor D. Thompson, and Brent R. Weisman. “Toward a View of History and Process at Crystal River.” Southeastern Archaeology29, no. 1 (Summer 2010): 164–81.

Thompson, Victor D., and Thomas J. Pluckhahn. “History, Complex Hunter-gatherers, and the Mounds and Monuments of Crystal River.” Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology5, issue 1 (April 2010): 33–51.

Writing Credits

Author: 
Willa Granger
×

Data

Timeline

  • 1000

    Built

Citation

Willa Granger, "Crystal River Archaeological State Park", [Crystal River, Florida], SAH Archipedia, eds. Gabrielle Esperdy and Karen Kingsley, Charlottesville: UVaP, 2012—, http://sah-archipedia.org/buildings/FL-01-017-9999.

If SAH Archipedia has been useful to you, please consider supporting it.

SAH Archipedia tells the story of the United States through its buildings, landscapes, and cities. This freely available resource empowers the public with authoritative knowledge that deepens their understanding and appreciation of the built environment. But the Society of Architectural Historians, which created SAH Archipedia with University of Virginia Press, needs your support to maintain the high-caliber research, writing, photography, cartography, editing, design, and programming that make SAH Archipedia a trusted online resource available to all who value the history of place, heritage tourism, and learning.

, ,